Review





Similar Products

99
ATCC human hcc cell lines hepg2
Human Hcc Cell Lines Hepg2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hepg2+cell+lines/10__1158_slash_2767___9764__crc___26___0139-76-5-32?v=ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human hcc cell lines hepg2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Procell Inc hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines hepg2
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Lines Hepg2, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hepg2+cell+lines/pm42302375-47-2-14?v=Procell+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines hepg2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC cell culture human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines hepg2
Cell Culture Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Lines Hepg2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hepg2+cell+lines/pm42288668-42-3-21?v=ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell culture human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines hepg2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC human hepg2 hepatoma cell line
Human Hepg2 Hepatoma Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hepg2+cell+lines/pm42184515-109-1-10?v=ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human hepg2 hepatoma cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC human liver cancer cell line hepg2
Human Liver Cancer Cell Line Hepg2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hepg2+cell+lines/pm42265110-297-1-8?v=ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human liver cancer cell line hepg2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC cell lines hepg2 c3a atcc
Cell Lines Hepg2 C3a Atcc, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hepg2+cell+lines/pm42258350-239-191-194?v=ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell lines hepg2 c3a atcc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC hepatocellular carcinoma cell line hepg2
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Line Hepg2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hepg2+cell+lines/pm41534752-80-0-5?v=ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hepatocellular carcinoma cell line hepg2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC hepatocellular carcinoma hepg2 c3a cell line
(A) Global histone succinylation measured by LC-MS/MS <t>in</t> <t>HepG2/C3A</t> cells following 48 hours of sodium succinate treatment. (B) Global histone succinylation in 3D cultured HepG2/C3A spheroids following 48 hours and 1 week of sodium succinate treatment. (C) Comparison of the relative abundance of succinyl-lysine residues in H3 and H4, in either treated or untreated, cultured cells (2D) or spheroids (3D). (D) Structure of the nucleosome with H3K64 residues highlighted to demonstrate solvent accessibility. (E) Abundance of succinyl-CoA in the nuclear fraction (left) and non-nuclear fraction (right) following sodium succinate treatment. (F) Total count of HepG2/C3A cells treated with 10 mM sodium succinate continuously for 48 to 144 hours, cell count taken every 48 hours. Data are shown as mean ± SEM; * p-value <0 . 05 in two-tailed Student’s t-test .
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Hepg2 C3a Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hepg2+cell+lines/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__05__29__728167-167-2-11?v=ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hepatocellular carcinoma hepg2 c3a cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC human hepatoma cell lines hepg2
SHBs is symmetrically dimethylated at arginine 169. (A–C) Huh7 and <t>HepG2</t> cells were transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag or Strep–Flag control. Strep pull–down (IP:Strep) was performed, followed by Western blot (WB) with antibodies against (A) monomethylarginine (MMA), (B) asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), or (C) symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA). SHBs in the IP fraction and SHBs/β–actin in input lysates are shown as controls. (D) Cells expressing SHBs–Strep–Flag were treated with adenosine dialdehyde (ADOX, 40 μM) for 36 h, followed by Strep pull–down and WB for SDMA and SHBs. Densitometric ratios (SDMA/IP–SHBs and SHBs/β–actin) are shown above/below the blots. (E) Huh7 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag or the indicated R→K mutants (R73K, R78K, R79K, R169K). SDMA on immunoprecipitated SHBs was assessed by Strep pull–down and WB; densitometric SDMA/IP–SHBs ratios are shown above the blots. (F–G) HepG2 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag or SHBs/R169K–Strep–Flag (F) and SHBs/R169A–Strep–Flag (G) and analyzed by Strep pull–down and WB as in (E).
Human Hepatoma Cell Lines Hepg2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hepg2+cell+lines/pmc13054410-38-0-5?v=ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human hepatoma cell lines hepg2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Global histone succinylation measured by LC-MS/MS in HepG2/C3A cells following 48 hours of sodium succinate treatment. (B) Global histone succinylation in 3D cultured HepG2/C3A spheroids following 48 hours and 1 week of sodium succinate treatment. (C) Comparison of the relative abundance of succinyl-lysine residues in H3 and H4, in either treated or untreated, cultured cells (2D) or spheroids (3D). (D) Structure of the nucleosome with H3K64 residues highlighted to demonstrate solvent accessibility. (E) Abundance of succinyl-CoA in the nuclear fraction (left) and non-nuclear fraction (right) following sodium succinate treatment. (F) Total count of HepG2/C3A cells treated with 10 mM sodium succinate continuously for 48 to 144 hours, cell count taken every 48 hours. Data are shown as mean ± SEM; * p-value <0 . 05 in two-tailed Student’s t-test .

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Histone succinylation directly inhibits Jumonji domain demethylases and stabilizes repressive chromatin states

doi: 10.64898/2026.05.29.728167

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Global histone succinylation measured by LC-MS/MS in HepG2/C3A cells following 48 hours of sodium succinate treatment. (B) Global histone succinylation in 3D cultured HepG2/C3A spheroids following 48 hours and 1 week of sodium succinate treatment. (C) Comparison of the relative abundance of succinyl-lysine residues in H3 and H4, in either treated or untreated, cultured cells (2D) or spheroids (3D). (D) Structure of the nucleosome with H3K64 residues highlighted to demonstrate solvent accessibility. (E) Abundance of succinyl-CoA in the nuclear fraction (left) and non-nuclear fraction (right) following sodium succinate treatment. (F) Total count of HepG2/C3A cells treated with 10 mM sodium succinate continuously for 48 to 144 hours, cell count taken every 48 hours. Data are shown as mean ± SEM; * p-value <0 . 05 in two-tailed Student’s t-test .

Article Snippet: The human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2/C3A cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, CRL-10741).

Techniques: Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy, Cell Culture, Comparison, Solvent, Cell Characterization, Two Tailed Test

(A) Schematic of peptide pull-down technique used to identify potential protein interactors with histone succinylation. (B) Volcano plot of fold change and significance of enrichment of nuclear proteins from HepG2/C3A cells to a Ksu synthetic peptide vs. Kac synthetic peptide. (C) Volcano plot of fold change and significance of enrichment of bromodomain proteins to Ksu synthetic histone peptide as compared to the Kac peptide, and (D) Ksu synthetic histone peptide as compared to an unmodified peptide. (E) Volcano plot of fold change and significance of enrichment of JmjC domain demethylases to Ksu synthetic histone peptide as compared to an Kac peptide and (F) Ksu synthetic histone peptide as compared to an unmodified peptide. (G) Crystal structure (PDB 6F6D) of an unmodified histone H3 peptide in the catalytic site of KDM6B. (H) Boltz2 model of a Ksu peptide (AARK(succinyl)A) in the catalytic site of KDM6B. (I) Enrichment of JmjC-domain demethylases to the chromatin-bound proteome of HepG2/C3A cells treated with 10 mM sodium succinate for 48 hours. A -log2 p-value greater than 4 indicates significant enrichment .

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Histone succinylation directly inhibits Jumonji domain demethylases and stabilizes repressive chromatin states

doi: 10.64898/2026.05.29.728167

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic of peptide pull-down technique used to identify potential protein interactors with histone succinylation. (B) Volcano plot of fold change and significance of enrichment of nuclear proteins from HepG2/C3A cells to a Ksu synthetic peptide vs. Kac synthetic peptide. (C) Volcano plot of fold change and significance of enrichment of bromodomain proteins to Ksu synthetic histone peptide as compared to the Kac peptide, and (D) Ksu synthetic histone peptide as compared to an unmodified peptide. (E) Volcano plot of fold change and significance of enrichment of JmjC domain demethylases to Ksu synthetic histone peptide as compared to an Kac peptide and (F) Ksu synthetic histone peptide as compared to an unmodified peptide. (G) Crystal structure (PDB 6F6D) of an unmodified histone H3 peptide in the catalytic site of KDM6B. (H) Boltz2 model of a Ksu peptide (AARK(succinyl)A) in the catalytic site of KDM6B. (I) Enrichment of JmjC-domain demethylases to the chromatin-bound proteome of HepG2/C3A cells treated with 10 mM sodium succinate for 48 hours. A -log2 p-value greater than 4 indicates significant enrichment .

Article Snippet: The human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2/C3A cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, CRL-10741).

Techniques:

(A) Known targets of JmjC domain demethylase family enzymes. (B) Relative abundance of methylation on targets of JmjC domain demethylases in HepG2/C3A cells treated with sodium succinate. (C) Relative abundance of methylation on targets of JmjC domain demethylases in HepG2/C3A 3D cells treated with sodium succinate. (D) ChIP-MS shows co-enrichment of succinylated histone peptides with H3K27me3 peptides. Data are shown as mean ± SEM; *p-value <0 . 05, **p-value <0 . 01 in two-tailed Student’s t-test .

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Histone succinylation directly inhibits Jumonji domain demethylases and stabilizes repressive chromatin states

doi: 10.64898/2026.05.29.728167

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Known targets of JmjC domain demethylase family enzymes. (B) Relative abundance of methylation on targets of JmjC domain demethylases in HepG2/C3A cells treated with sodium succinate. (C) Relative abundance of methylation on targets of JmjC domain demethylases in HepG2/C3A 3D cells treated with sodium succinate. (D) ChIP-MS shows co-enrichment of succinylated histone peptides with H3K27me3 peptides. Data are shown as mean ± SEM; *p-value <0 . 05, **p-value <0 . 01 in two-tailed Student’s t-test .

Article Snippet: The human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2/C3A cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, CRL-10741).

Techniques: Methylation, Two Tailed Test

SHBs is symmetrically dimethylated at arginine 169. (A–C) Huh7 and HepG2 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag or Strep–Flag control. Strep pull–down (IP:Strep) was performed, followed by Western blot (WB) with antibodies against (A) monomethylarginine (MMA), (B) asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), or (C) symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA). SHBs in the IP fraction and SHBs/β–actin in input lysates are shown as controls. (D) Cells expressing SHBs–Strep–Flag were treated with adenosine dialdehyde (ADOX, 40 μM) for 36 h, followed by Strep pull–down and WB for SDMA and SHBs. Densitometric ratios (SDMA/IP–SHBs and SHBs/β–actin) are shown above/below the blots. (E) Huh7 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag or the indicated R→K mutants (R73K, R78K, R79K, R169K). SDMA on immunoprecipitated SHBs was assessed by Strep pull–down and WB; densitometric SDMA/IP–SHBs ratios are shown above the blots. (F–G) HepG2 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag or SHBs/R169K–Strep–Flag (F) and SHBs/R169A–Strep–Flag (G) and analyzed by Strep pull–down and WB as in (E).

Journal: Tumour Virus Research

Article Title: PRMT5–mediated symmetric dimethylation of SHBs at Arg169 stabilizes SHBs and promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth

doi: 10.1016/j.tvr.2026.200340

Figure Lengend Snippet: SHBs is symmetrically dimethylated at arginine 169. (A–C) Huh7 and HepG2 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag or Strep–Flag control. Strep pull–down (IP:Strep) was performed, followed by Western blot (WB) with antibodies against (A) monomethylarginine (MMA), (B) asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), or (C) symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA). SHBs in the IP fraction and SHBs/β–actin in input lysates are shown as controls. (D) Cells expressing SHBs–Strep–Flag were treated with adenosine dialdehyde (ADOX, 40 μM) for 36 h, followed by Strep pull–down and WB for SDMA and SHBs. Densitometric ratios (SDMA/IP–SHBs and SHBs/β–actin) are shown above/below the blots. (E) Huh7 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag or the indicated R→K mutants (R73K, R78K, R79K, R169K). SDMA on immunoprecipitated SHBs was assessed by Strep pull–down and WB; densitometric SDMA/IP–SHBs ratios are shown above the blots. (F–G) HepG2 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag or SHBs/R169K–Strep–Flag (F) and SHBs/R169A–Strep–Flag (G) and analyzed by Strep pull–down and WB as in (E).

Article Snippet: Human hepatoma cell lines HepG2 (ATCC, HB–8065) and Huh7 (JCRB, JCRB0403), endothelial cell line EA.hy926 (ATCC, CRL–2922TM), and HEK293T cells (ATCC, CRL–3216) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank (JCRB, Japan).

Techniques: Transfection, Control, Western Blot, Expressing, Immunoprecipitation

PRMT interacts with SHBs. (A) Huh7 cells were co–transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag (or Strep–Flag control) together with Flag–PRMT9. Strep pull–down was followed by WB with anti–Flag and anti–SHBs to assess co–precipitation. (B) Huh7 and HepG2 cells were co–transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag (or Strep–Flag control) together with Flag–PRMT5 and analyzed by Strep pull–down and WB as in (A). (C) Huh7 and HepG2 cells were co–transfected with plasmids encoding Strep–Flag–PRMT5 and SHBs–myc. Strep pull–down was performed and precipitates were immunoblotted for SHBs and Flag to validate the interaction. (D) Direct interaction between SHBs and PRMT5 was tested by GST pull–down. Purified GST or GST–PRMT5 (Coomassie–stained gel, left) was incubated with in vitro–translated SHBs–Flag, and bound SHBs was detected by WB using anti–Flag (right). (E) Confocal microscopy showing subcellular localization of SHBs (red) and PRMT5 (green) with nuclear DAPI staining (blue). Merged images and a representative line–scan fluorescence intensity profile (right) are shown.

Journal: Tumour Virus Research

Article Title: PRMT5–mediated symmetric dimethylation of SHBs at Arg169 stabilizes SHBs and promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth

doi: 10.1016/j.tvr.2026.200340

Figure Lengend Snippet: PRMT interacts with SHBs. (A) Huh7 cells were co–transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag (or Strep–Flag control) together with Flag–PRMT9. Strep pull–down was followed by WB with anti–Flag and anti–SHBs to assess co–precipitation. (B) Huh7 and HepG2 cells were co–transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag (or Strep–Flag control) together with Flag–PRMT5 and analyzed by Strep pull–down and WB as in (A). (C) Huh7 and HepG2 cells were co–transfected with plasmids encoding Strep–Flag–PRMT5 and SHBs–myc. Strep pull–down was performed and precipitates were immunoblotted for SHBs and Flag to validate the interaction. (D) Direct interaction between SHBs and PRMT5 was tested by GST pull–down. Purified GST or GST–PRMT5 (Coomassie–stained gel, left) was incubated with in vitro–translated SHBs–Flag, and bound SHBs was detected by WB using anti–Flag (right). (E) Confocal microscopy showing subcellular localization of SHBs (red) and PRMT5 (green) with nuclear DAPI staining (blue). Merged images and a representative line–scan fluorescence intensity profile (right) are shown.

Article Snippet: Human hepatoma cell lines HepG2 (ATCC, HB–8065) and Huh7 (JCRB, JCRB0403), endothelial cell line EA.hy926 (ATCC, CRL–2922TM), and HEK293T cells (ATCC, CRL–3216) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank (JCRB, Japan).

Techniques: Transfection, Control, Purification, Staining, Incubation, In Vitro, Confocal Microscopy, Fluorescence

PRMT5 stabilizes SHBs protein expression in an Arg169–dependent manner. (A) Huh7 and HepG2 cells were co–transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag or SHBs/R169K–Strep–Flag together with increasing amounts of Flag–PRMT5 (0, 1, 3 μg). Whole–cell lysates were immunoblotted for SHBs, Flag, and β–actin; SHBs/β–actin ratios are shown above the blots. (B) Cells expressing SHBs–Strep–Flag or SHBs/R169K–Strep–Flag were transfected with NC or PRMT5 siRNAs (#1, #2). Lysates were immunoblotted for SHBs, PRMT5, and β–actin; SHBs/β–actin ratios are shown. (C–D) Cycloheximide (CHX) chase assays in (C) Huh7 and (D) HepG2 cells. Cells expressing SHBs or SHBs/R169K with vector or Flag–PRMT5 were treated with CHX for the indicated times (0–120 min), followed by WB for SHBs, Flag, and β–actin. Plots show relative SHBs levels normalized to time 0 with fitted linear regression (equations displayed). (E) HepG2 cells were co–transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep, HA–K48Ub, together with or without Flag–PRMT5, and treated with MG132 (20 μM) for 8 h, the ubiquitination levels of SHBs was evaluated via ubiquitination assay analysis. (F) HepG2 cells were co–transfected with plasmid encoding SHBs–Strep and TRIM21–myc (or control vector) and Flag–PRMT5 (or control vector), the cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation using Strep–Tactin and analyzed by immunoblotting.

Journal: Tumour Virus Research

Article Title: PRMT5–mediated symmetric dimethylation of SHBs at Arg169 stabilizes SHBs and promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth

doi: 10.1016/j.tvr.2026.200340

Figure Lengend Snippet: PRMT5 stabilizes SHBs protein expression in an Arg169–dependent manner. (A) Huh7 and HepG2 cells were co–transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep–Flag or SHBs/R169K–Strep–Flag together with increasing amounts of Flag–PRMT5 (0, 1, 3 μg). Whole–cell lysates were immunoblotted for SHBs, Flag, and β–actin; SHBs/β–actin ratios are shown above the blots. (B) Cells expressing SHBs–Strep–Flag or SHBs/R169K–Strep–Flag were transfected with NC or PRMT5 siRNAs (#1, #2). Lysates were immunoblotted for SHBs, PRMT5, and β–actin; SHBs/β–actin ratios are shown. (C–D) Cycloheximide (CHX) chase assays in (C) Huh7 and (D) HepG2 cells. Cells expressing SHBs or SHBs/R169K with vector or Flag–PRMT5 were treated with CHX for the indicated times (0–120 min), followed by WB for SHBs, Flag, and β–actin. Plots show relative SHBs levels normalized to time 0 with fitted linear regression (equations displayed). (E) HepG2 cells were co–transfected with plasmids encoding SHBs–Strep, HA–K48Ub, together with or without Flag–PRMT5, and treated with MG132 (20 μM) for 8 h, the ubiquitination levels of SHBs was evaluated via ubiquitination assay analysis. (F) HepG2 cells were co–transfected with plasmid encoding SHBs–Strep and TRIM21–myc (or control vector) and Flag–PRMT5 (or control vector), the cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation using Strep–Tactin and analyzed by immunoblotting.

Article Snippet: Human hepatoma cell lines HepG2 (ATCC, HB–8065) and Huh7 (JCRB, JCRB0403), endothelial cell line EA.hy926 (ATCC, CRL–2922TM), and HEK293T cells (ATCC, CRL–3216) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank (JCRB, Japan).

Techniques: Expressing, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Control, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot

Arg169 symmetric dimethylation is required for SHBs–driven angiogenesis and tumor growth. (A) WB analysis of SHBs and BIP expression in stably transduced Huh7 and HepG2 cells (Vector, SHBs, and SHBs/R169K). (B) ELISA measurement of VEGFA levels in the supernatants of Huh7/HepG2–Vector, Huh7/HepG2–SHBs, or Huh7/HepG2–SHBs/R169K cells. (C) Endothelial tube formation assay. EA.hy926 cells were cultured with conditioned media (CM) from Huh7 or HepG2 stable lines (Vector, SHBs, SHBs/R169K). Representative images and quantification of mesh numbers are shown. (D) Transwell migration assay. EA.hy926 cells were assessed for migration in response to CM from the indicated stable lines. Representative images and quantification of migrated cell numbers per field are shown. (E) Representative images of excised subcutaneous xenograft tumors derived from Huh7–Vector, Huh7–SHBs, or Huh7–SHBs/R169K cells. (F) Tumor growth curves (tumor volume over time) for the indicated xenograft groups. (G) Tumor weights at endpoint. (H) Representative immunohistochemical staining of xenograft tumors for CD31 and SHBs, with quantification of microvessel density (MVD) based on CD31 staining. Data are presented as mean ± SD; ∗ P < 0.05 as indicated.

Journal: Tumour Virus Research

Article Title: PRMT5–mediated symmetric dimethylation of SHBs at Arg169 stabilizes SHBs and promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth

doi: 10.1016/j.tvr.2026.200340

Figure Lengend Snippet: Arg169 symmetric dimethylation is required for SHBs–driven angiogenesis and tumor growth. (A) WB analysis of SHBs and BIP expression in stably transduced Huh7 and HepG2 cells (Vector, SHBs, and SHBs/R169K). (B) ELISA measurement of VEGFA levels in the supernatants of Huh7/HepG2–Vector, Huh7/HepG2–SHBs, or Huh7/HepG2–SHBs/R169K cells. (C) Endothelial tube formation assay. EA.hy926 cells were cultured with conditioned media (CM) from Huh7 or HepG2 stable lines (Vector, SHBs, SHBs/R169K). Representative images and quantification of mesh numbers are shown. (D) Transwell migration assay. EA.hy926 cells were assessed for migration in response to CM from the indicated stable lines. Representative images and quantification of migrated cell numbers per field are shown. (E) Representative images of excised subcutaneous xenograft tumors derived from Huh7–Vector, Huh7–SHBs, or Huh7–SHBs/R169K cells. (F) Tumor growth curves (tumor volume over time) for the indicated xenograft groups. (G) Tumor weights at endpoint. (H) Representative immunohistochemical staining of xenograft tumors for CD31 and SHBs, with quantification of microvessel density (MVD) based on CD31 staining. Data are presented as mean ± SD; ∗ P < 0.05 as indicated.

Article Snippet: Human hepatoma cell lines HepG2 (ATCC, HB–8065) and Huh7 (JCRB, JCRB0403), endothelial cell line EA.hy926 (ATCC, CRL–2922TM), and HEK293T cells (ATCC, CRL–3216) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank (JCRB, Japan).

Techniques: Expressing, Stable Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Endothelial Tube Formation Assay, Cell Culture, Transwell Migration Assay, Migration, Derivative Assay, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining